Kensington Terrace.info
STOP TONI ATKINS!!!

Atkins is running for California State Assembly.  End her political career now! She did not represent her City District 3 constituents, nor will she represent District 76.  She represents developers, including her wife, Jennifer LaSar's company.  Think she advocates for affordable housing for an altruistic reason?  Perhaps it's because LaSar is in the affordable housing development business?

Atkins sold Kensington down the river, and did the same for Hillcrest with her decision on the 301 University project.  Both were inappropriate attempts to grant zoning variances to developers in violation of California laws.

In the  report titled SAN DIEGO CITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PROFESSIONALS IN A MAZE, the Grand Jury examines six development projects, including Kensington Terrace.  Starting with the premise, "There is considerable lack of clarity and excessive latitude in the application of the City’s ordinances in approving development projects", the Grand Jury has this to say about the Kensington Terrace Case Study:


"These case studies indicate that MNDs are sometimes inaccurate and that perhaps they are used too often when EIRs would be more appropriate. Externally generated codes and restrictions such as FEMA regulations have not always been understood or enforced by the DSD. It was also observed at several City Council meetings that the DSD staff present could not answer the questions from members of the Council. In several of these cases we found evidence that people with vested interests persistently interfered with and badgered city personnel involved in the planning and approval processes to get various changes made in community plans and regulations."


The Grand Jury had specific recommendations related to Kensington Terrace:

RECOMMENDATIONS

 08-32: Ensure that MNDs are complete and accurate and contain full disclosures.

 08-33: Demand complete and accurate EIRs and MNDs with full disclosures.

 08-34: Insist on firm, clear answers to their questions at the time they are asked or at the next City Council meeting


Gee, I think that's exactly what we were asking for.


"Developers' money is like heroin to politicians." - Roy P. Disney, March 2, 2008, Los Angeles Times


We need open, honest government that is working for people, not developers.”  - Stephen Whitburn, March 15, 2008, San Diego Union Tribune


Do we need a developer representing the 76th District? 


Do we need someone who voted to underfund the City's pension system? 


Besides underfunding the pension, Atkins took advantage of another City pension boondoggle that allowed employees to buy credits for years of service that they didn’t work.  The cost to the employee (Atkins) was subsidized by the city (i.e., the residents of the City who pay taxes). Atkins purchased more than five years of service in 2003 for nearly $59,000, which will boost her annual retirement check by $13,700 to a total of $47,800 annually. It will take her about four-and-one-third years to recover the money invested. She worked for the city for almost seven years as a council aide and worked a total of 15 years for the city.  Nice for her, bad for the rest of us.


Controversial Pension Benefit Purchased



What happens when you attempt urban infill development without adhering to the process under the California Environmental Quality Act?  Just ask the City of San Diego.